Africa/abandoned theme parks

I was very impressed on how close he got to the animals. His photos were so in focus and showed depth and movement. I was also suppressed that it took him 18 days to get a picture of a lion and weeks to get on of the giraffes. His photos were very inspiring.

In the black and white photo there is a man kneeling down holding two big elephant tusks next to his head in the bottom third of the photo. The photo shows the plain desert landscape and the sky. I like this photo because it makes the viewer feel like the man feels bad for killing the elephant because of the way he is crouched down. The elephant, a huge animal compared to the man, seems so important because by looking at the photo it looks as if the tusks are bigger than the man.
The rule of simplicity is used because the background is just the plain flat land scape and the sky. This puts all the focus on the man and the tusks. the rule of thirds is present because the man is in the bottom left of the photo.
He uses a Pentax 67II with only two fixed lenses. He doesn't use zoom lenses because he wants to capture the spirt of the animals.
Brandt is dedicated to conserve Africa's wildlife and ecosystem

the animals came first, photography second. Photography was merely the best medium for me to express my feelings about animals, and the natural world.
 Nick Brandt

Shidaka’s Utopia, Beppu, Kyushu, Japan

I think this would be an interesting place to visit because it is a mystery why the park shut down and every thing is left as it was like being frozen in time. and in the house of horrors the creepy monsters decay. 

other unusual photo ideas
unusual buildings
the moon
volcanoes
caves
weird cars


Neil Armstrong was the first to take photos on the moon.

It would be fun to take photos of the moon's land scape because not many people have seen very many photos of the moon. It would be interesting to get a different perspective for he moon. On the moon you could take pictures of craters and other land elements of the moon.

It would take a rocket to take pictures at my location. you would also have to be a trained astronaut and have a fancy space suit and everything. Also you would have to become friend with NASA and have them help you out. not to mention the crazy expenses of a rocket and the fuel and everything. And the planning and coordination of all the people you would need to be involved would take a lot of work. you would also need a camera that would work on the extreme heat and cool of the moon. I don't think the main purpose of going to the moon should be just to take photos. It would take a lot of work and seems kind of pointless to go to the moon in order to just take photos.